Ban The Bulb... by 2012 in California?
Ban The Bulb is delighted to hear that Lloyd Levine a Democrat Assembly Member for California has proposed a ban on the sale of incandescent light bulbs by 2012.
Lloyd's proposal shows moral courage and political imagination, and provides an excellent example to politicians all over the world.
I hope that Lloyd's proposal will attract cross-party support in California and get replicated in other US states.
With any luck this bold move might even persuade a few more British and EU politicians that the banning incandescent light bulbs is an idea worthy of their support!
Levine Legislation to Make California First State in the Nation to Ban Incandescent Light Bulbs
"How many legislators does it take to change a light bulb act" Touts the Multiple Benefits of Energy-Saving Light Bulbs
SACRAMENTO –– In yet another instance of California being a trend-setter for the rest of the nation, Assemblymember Lloyd Levine (D-Van Nuys), the Chair of the Assembly’s Utilities and Commerce Committee, today announced that he is introducing legislation - the How Many Legislators Does it Take to Change a Light Bulb Act - to ban the sale of incandescent light bulbs in California by the year 2012.
“Incandescent light bulbs were first developed almost 125 years ago, and since that time they have undergone no major modifications,” Assemblymember Levine said. “Meanwhile, they remain incredibly inefficient, converting only about five percent of the energy they receive into light. It’s time to take a step forward – energy-efficient bulbs are easy to use, require less electricity to do the same job, cut greenhouse gas emissions, and save consumers money.”
According to the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI), a nonprofit organization that focuses on energy policy, replacing a 75-watt incandescent light bulb with a 20-watt compact fluorescent would result in the same amount of light but would save 1,300 pounds of carbon dioxide and save customers $55 over the life of the bulb (while the life of one 75-watt incandescent bulb is roughly 750 hours, the life of a compact fluorescent is a whopping 10,000 hours). Meanwhile, incandescent bulbs use 750 kWh over 10,000 hours, while compact fluorescents use only 180 kWh.
In addition, a utility can give away a compact fluorescent lamps more cheaply than it can fuel its existing power plants, which is why Southern California Edison, for example, has given away more than a million such lamps.
“Electricity-saving technologies may not be glamorous, especially when compared with the idea of a shiny new power plant, but the facts are that there are hundreds of electricity-saving innovations now on the market that if fully used throughout the United States, would significantly decrease the electricity the country now uses,” Levine said. “The time has come for this legislation, and what better state to lead the charge than California.”
With thanks to TreeHugger
and New Consumer