Campaign Archive: (Feb 05 to present)
1. Create a deadline for action Ban the sale of incandescents by specific dates Ban 60W + 100W incandescents first (bayonet + screw)
Ban other incandescent designs later
2. Remove the price advantage of incandescents Increase the cost of incandescent light bulbs
Reduce the sales tax (VAT) on CFLs from 17.5% to 5%
3. Help the poor
Help the poor to replace their incandescents Help the poor to save money on their energy bills
4. Encourage responsible recycling
Encourage the responsible recycling of CFLs Encourage fair + adequate funding for recycling Encourage discussions amongst recycling stakeholders
5. Encourage + strengthen supporting legislation
Include light bulbs in the EU's Eco Directive Explain the pros + cons of the EU's RoHS Directive
6. Propose appriopriate exemptions Make the case for appropriate medical and specialist exemptions
7. Encourage continued innovation
Propose that technology neutral "watts per lumen"
criteria should be included in ban legislation
Propose "watts per lumen per m2" as further criteria
Highlight promising technologies as they emerge
8. Encourage energy efficiency and conservation
Explain the benefits of greater energy efficiency Explain the benefits of turning things off Accelerate the uptake of available technologies
9. Use LEDs to set energy performance standards
LEDs offer a 90% energy saving CFLs offer a 65-80% energy saving High efficiency incandescents offer a 25% saving Incandescents offer 0% energy saving
Banning incandescent light bulbs would...
Save 2 to 5 Million tonnes of CO2 per year in the UK
Save 23 to 53 Million tonnes of CO2 per year in the EU
Global Energy Use:
BBC "Green Room" 3 Feb 06
Light bulbs: Not such a bright idea
BBC "Green Room" 21 April 06
Shedding light on call to ban bulb
BBC "Green Room" 20 Oct 06
Where have all the leaders gone?
BBC article 29 Jun 06 Lighting the key to energy saving
IEA : Lights Labour Lost report
BBC article 2 Nov 06 Bulbs must be efficient by 2009
BBC "Green Room" 19 Jan 07 The need for ambition + imagination
Stern Review: Summary
Guardian article 1 Feb 07 Should I replace incandescents now?
Worldwatch: Effects of WEEE Directive
BBC article 31 Jan 07 Plan to ban light bulbs... in California
Nine MSN article 20 Feb 07 Plan to ban light bulbs... in Australia
BBC article 20 Feb 07 Australia pulls plug on old bulbs
Courier Mail article 21 Feb 07 See the light Turnbull
EurActiv article 21 Feb 07 How many EU members does it take to change a light bulb?
Guardian article 22 Feb 07 Should we ban these bulbs?
Scotsman article 24 Feb 07 How many light bulbs does it take
to change the world?
Daily Mail article 10 Mar 07 EU switches off our old light bulbs
BBC "Green Room" 16 July 07 Sex sells, but at what cost?
The Guardian article 27 Sept 07 UK to phase out 150W, 100W + 60W bulbs
The Guardian article 27 Sept 07
Ban The Bulb?
International Light Bulb Campaigns 18 Seconds (US)
Greenpeace India : BTB petition (India)
www.banthebulb.co.uk (UK: unaffiliated)
Campaigns One Watt Initiative (IEA)
One Billion Bulbs (US)
Big Green Switch (UK)
Eco Portal Eco Earth Info (US)
References Homestayfinder: How CFLs work MPs' Letters: EU light bulb rules Wikipedia: Ozone Depletion
EU: Kyoto Protocol
Lighting Industry Federation
>LIF: Lamp Guide 2001 pdf
UK Climate Change Programme
>UK CCP: Review pdf
UK Market Transformation Programme
ECCP Report 2001 pdf
European Lamp Companies Federation
DTI: WEEE Directive
Energy Saving Trust
GE: Soft White Dimmable CFLs
Cubans + Jamaicans hand out free CFLs
Energy Saving Trust
Low energy fittings
Save Your 20%
Customer Utility Services
Light bulb suppliers
Direct Trade Supplies
Light Rabbit : Commercial
AVR LED Track Lighting
Synergy Lighting USA (USA)
Express Light Bulbs
LED Light Bulbs
LED Lighting Supplier
eco LED Light
LED Eco Lights
Light Bulb Planet
First Light Direct
Lamps On Line
Bright Green Technology (signs)
Eco Friendly Light Bulbs
Go Green Lights (UK)
Energy Saving World (UK)
Light Bulbs Direct (UK)
Better Generation (UK)
Efficient Light (UK)
The Bulbman (US)
LED Online [LEDs] (UK)
OptoSource [LEDs] (UK)
CyberLux [LEDs] (US)
Androv Medical (UK)
The Light Bulb (UK)
Solar Power Centre (UK)
Intelligent Energy Solutions (UK)
Solar Insiders (UK)
Solar Gadget Store (UK)
Select Solar Panels (UK)
Energy Saving Advice
Conserve Energy (UK)
Intelligent Energy Solutions (UK)
Solar Security Solutions (UK)
Energy Company Advice
Good Energy Shop (UK)
Home Energy Generation / Storage
Cyber Energy (UK)
Low carbon technology sites
The Solar Centre (UK)
Price comparison sites
Business Electricity Prices (UK)
Business Gas Prices (UK)
USwitch: Business Energy (UK)
Home Advisory Service (UK)
UK Power (UK)
Business Gas (UK) Business Electricity (UK)
Solar Price Comparison Services
Talk Solar Panels (UK)
Talk Solar Boilers (UK)
Solar Quote Provider (UK)
Lux Outdoor Ligting (UK)
The Eco Experts (UK)
Light bulb history
1809 Humphrey Davy (Arc lamp) 1820 Warren De la Rue (vacuum + wire) 1879 Edison and Swan (carbon + cotton) 1880 Edison (carbon + bamboo) 1898 Karl Auer (osmium) 1903 Siemens/Halske (tantalum) 1906 to 10 GEC/William Coolidge (tungsten)
Fluorescent light and lamp history
1857 Becquerel (fluorescence) 1901 Cooper Hewitt (mercury vapour lamp) 1934 Germer (high pressure lamp) 1970s Anderson + Hollister (electrodeless) 1976 Edward Hammer (spiral lamp)
Mercury + Fluorescent Lights
Michigan Dept. of Env. Quality
Energy Efficiency Advice
EU Energy Label
Insulation + Windows
Find recommended products (UK)
Generate your own energy
Solar water heating
Small scale wind
Small scale hydro
The Guardian 7 Dec 05
BBC News Online 'Green Room' 3 Feb 06
BBC Radio 4 'Broadcasting House' 5 Feb 06
Austrian Broadcasting Corp. 7 Feb 06
BBC Radio Wales 8 Feb 06
BBC News Online 8 Feb 06
The Hindustan Times editorial
The Guardian "Campaign O.T.W. " 21 Feb 06
BBC Radio Essex 22 Feb 06
Interesting energy ideas...
Option 10 (UK)
Light Up The World (Can)
Downshifting Path (UK)
Cent. for Alt. Tech. (Wales)
Patio Heaters Are Evil (UK)
Friends of the Earth Greenpeace International Natural Resources Defense Council New Economics Foundation WWF
Renewable Energy Businesses
Climate Stability 2005
UK Energy Research Centre
National Audit Office > report
Alternative Energy Blog
Sierra Club Scoop
© matt prescott
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
Guest blog : Trust and the need for independent lab testsby Rory Wilding, Which LED Light
For anyone shopping, switching to LED lighting represents one of the biggest opportunities to make significant money savings whilst also reducing our environmental impact.
Despite the clear financial benefits of investing more money upfront in a longer lasting LED light bulb, which produces strong white light and is dimmable, we have seen little excitement about this new technology from the average person on the street.
This is strange as unlike other sustainability initiatives, switching to LED lighting is one of the easiest changes an individual can make on a day-to-day level. No major new habits are necessary and no sacrifices in lighting performance are required; people can have all of the light they are used to at a fraction of the cost by simply switching a new underlying technology, which increasingly looks just like the old one.
Even better, once the switch has been made its not uncommon for LED light bulbs to have lifetimes of up to 25 years before needed to be changed again. So again, why the hesitation?
Partners on both sides appear willing – customers clearly want cheaper bills and manufacturers, at least on paper, have a product to sell that can help achieve this goal.
Well, at Which LED Light we think there could be some trust issues in the market!
In recent years there has been a tide of stories where consumers have been the only real victim; the horse meat scandal, rising energy prices in contrast to falling oil prices, and the price fixing of milk to name a few. The latest? Fudged emissions data by Volkswagen to get their diesel cars through the emissions testing process.
People originally bought into diesel cars on the promise of a greener more efficient technology. This has dramatically shifted into consumers being fooled into purchases through corporate fraud and with senior executives looking potentially complicit in the process.
Volkswagen found a way of cheating in the lab tests for their vehicles’ emissions with a ‘defeat device’ that could sense when the car was being tested and adjust its NOx emissions downwards accordingly. Another way of putting this is VW had cheated because they were allowed to mark their own homework and avoid both independent scrutiny and full public disclosure.
This highlights a real need for transparency in the way data is gathered and the software systems being used during and after performance tests. It also adds fuel to the fire when it comes to consumer confidence in so-called ‘green’ or ‘clean’ technologies.
Make no mistake we are all for LED lighting and believe its one of the biggest no-brainers of the last decade; the global cost of lighting energy is approximately $230 billion per year, of which $100 to $135 billion can be saved with present-day technologies. However to realise these savings there is a desperate need to create confidence with end-users to accelerate uptake.
Unfortunately, an implicit assumption from consumers is that there will be gap between what brands claim in terms of quality and what they will experience with LED lighting once they buy it. The fairest way to tackle this problem is to put all lights on an even playing field and test their performance claims through an independent test lab in a consistent fashion.
We request that manufacturers provide us with independent lab test to verify LED product claims. We can then allow our users to filter products to see which LED bulbs have had an independent lab test to verify the manufacturers claims. We hope that implementing this proposal would help to create the trust needed by this new and uncertain market place. Such a measure would allow people to make a truly informed purchasing decision based around transparent data and impartiality rather than brand strength alone.
Remember – Volkswagen has been the top selling automaker in Europe for the past two decades. The point we are making here is that data is essentially meaningless unless gathered in an independent fashion. To truly inspire consumers to make that leap of faith with a new technology means the onus is on manufacturers to reduce the risk on the individual by providing as much transparent data as possible.
Relationships are built on trust. At Which LED Light, we have discussed the psychology of consumers before in relation to manufacturers and LED lighting. In the age of information, on-demand brands need to look at consumers in less of a transactional fashion and more as an ongoing relationship. The truth is just a Google search, tweet, or Facebook post away. If people trust the technology and the benefits are clear then uptake is inevitable and potential payback for people and planet is obvious.
The LED lighting market is becoming increasingly crowded with large corporate non-traditional lighting players like IKEA and Dyson entering the market alongside an influx of start-ups. The manufacturers that are aware of this and act early will be the ones that win out. Without trust LED light bulbs may take years to move into the mainstream thus reducing sales for manufacturers and denying consumers one of the most disruptive technologies of recent years.
In lighting, as in all areas of life, trust is not granted, it has to be earned.
Posted 9:18 AM by Matt Prescott